We put the Apple iPhone Air through our rigorous SBMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article analyzes the behavior of the device in a series of tests and several common use cases and aims to highlight the most important results of our tests with an excerpt of the acquired data.
Overview
Key Camera Specifications:
- Primary: 48MP 1/1.56-inch sensor, 1.0µm pixels, 26mm-equivalent f/1.6 aperture lens, dual-pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS
Pro
- Accurate target exposure and wide dynamic range
- Nice color in most conditions
- Good balance between texture and noise, especially in bright conditions
- Good detail and exposure in night shots
- Very effective image stabilization in video mode ensures smooth shooting
Against
- No tele or ultra-wide camera modules
- Some underexposure when taking photos of high-contrast scenes
- A shallow depth of field can cause background subjects to be out of focus
- Lack of detail, inaccurate exposure in bokeh mode, slight segmentation errors in difficult scenes
- Slightly slow focusing in photo mode, occasional loss of focus in video mode
- Exposure instability, slight color casts and white balance adaptation problems in videos
The Apple iPhone Air performed well in the SBMARK Camera tests, but the lack of dedicated telephoto and ultra-wide camera modules means it can’t claim a place among the best in our rankings. In terms of camera, the iPhone Air is essentially a simplified version of the iPhone 17 Pro, with just one camera module instead of the Pro’s three. Performance is very close to that of the 17 Pro’s main camera module, producing bright images with great image quality. However, the lack of tele and ultra-wide modules affects the Air’s photography experience, especially when compared to some direct competitors, such as the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, which includes an ultra-wide module for greater shooting flexibility.
That said, the Air’s single camera module captures nice photos in most shooting conditions, with usually pleasing colors and warm white balance. Detail is good and noise levels are low, especially when shooting in daylight. Small differences compared to the 17 Pro are noticeable in low light conditions, where the Pro is slightly ahead in terms of detail preservation and noise reduction. As on the Pro, depth of field is slightly limited. As a result, background subjects in group photos may appear out of focus.
In video mode, iPhone Air offers a wide range of resolutions and frame rates, up to 60 fps in 4K and 240 fps in 1080p Full HD. Our tests were run at 4K/60fps where the device produced the best overall results, with the HDR format offering a wide dynamic range and vivid colours. The texture/noise trade-off is good in most shooting conditions, and effective image stabilization ensures stable footage. However, our testers noted occasional exposure instability and white balance matching issues, as well as some slight refocusing during recording.
Test summary
About SBMARK Camera Tests: Evaluations of SBMARK cameras take place in labs and real-world situations using a wide variety of use cases. Scores are based on objective tests whose results are calculated directly using measurement software in our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests where a sophisticated set of metrics allows a panel of imaging experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo and video quality are evaluated separately and then combined into an overall score for comparing cameras on different devices. For more information on the SBMARK camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores can be found here. The following section compiles key elements of SBMARK’s comprehensive testing and analysis. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us to find out how to receive a full report.
Apple iPhone Air Camera Scores
This graph compares SBMARK photo and video scores between the tested device and the references. The average and maximum scores of the price range are also indicated. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK database of tested devices.
Photo
134
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
About SBMARK Camera Photo Tests
For scoring and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 3,800 test images in controlled laboratory environments, as well as natural outdoor, indoor and low-light scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photography protocol is designed to take into account key use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, landscapes and zoom photography. Evaluation is performed by visually examining images Cons a natural scene reference and performing objective measurements on laboratory-captured graph images under varying lighting conditions from 0.1 to 10,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.
In our tests, the iPhone Air’s image quality and camera performance were very close to the iPhone 17 Pro’s main camera module, with similar strengths and weaknesses. Overall image quality is very good, with a pleasing image result in most shooting conditions. Skin tones are very well rendered and well exposed, especially when images are viewed on an HDR display, but some occasional underexposure can be noticeable in difficult high-contrast scenes.
Images captured with the iPhone Air camera offer very good detail and a good compromise between detail and noise, especially when shooting in bright light. In low-light scenes noise can become more intrusive and detail levels are slightly lower than on the flagship iPhone 17 Pro. The autofocus system mostly does a good job. Images are sharp and well-focused in most situations, but focus could be slightly quicker to lock. Depth of field is also a bit shallow, resulting in some background subjects appearing blurry in group shots.
When shooting in portrait mode, the camera produces beautiful images with a natural simulated bokeh effect. However, there can be a lack of detail on subjects, and our testers also noticed imprecise subject segmentation, especially in difficult scenes. The iPhone Air doesn’t come with a dedicated tele zoom camera, so it’s no surprise that detail in tele images could be better, especially at the medium- and long-range tele settings. This is also where the difference compared to the iPhone 17 Pro is most noticeable. At close telephoto, the camera produces decent detail, pretty much on par with the iPhone’s flagship model.
Principal
166
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Apple iPhone Air Photo Scores
Exposure
125
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Color
129
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good images. For exposure, the main attribute evaluated is the brightness level of the main subject across various use cases such as landscape, portrait or still life. Other factors evaluated are global contrast and the ability to render the dynamic range of the scene (ability to make details visible in both bright and dark areas). When the camera provides the Photo HDR format, images are analyzed with a display on an HDR reference monitor, under the reference conditions specified in the ISO-22028-5 standard. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to provide the same rendering when shooting multiple images of the same scene.
Regarding color, the image quality attributes analyzed are skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading and repeatability. Regarding color and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors based on the results collected in various studies and consumer insights, respecting the manufacturer’s choice of color signature.


Apple iPhone 17 Pro – Precise exposure, warm white balance, pleasant color rendering

Auto focus
116
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Autofocus tests focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shutter lag, and depth of field. Shutter delay is the difference between when the user presses the capture button and when the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the device’s ability to capture images at the right time, the so-called “zero shutter lag” capability. While a shallow depth of field can be nice for single-subject portraits or close-ups, it can also pose a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all real-world images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and low-light to outdoor conditions.
Irregularity of edge sharpness and average shot delay under all tested conditions
Autofocus irregularity and speed: 1000Lux Δ0EV portable daylight
Structure
124
VivoX200Ultra
VivoX200Ultra
Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images taken in the lab and in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the light and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on map images taken under various lighting conditions from 0.1 to 10,000+ lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The papers used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) paper and the Dead Leaves paper. We also have an AI-based metric for the level of detail on our lifelike Eugene and Diana mannequins.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels for Handheld Conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score with lux level, for two retention conditions. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate the performance of texture and detail on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.
Noise
121
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, texture on real-life images and on graph images taken in the laboratory. For natural images, particular attention is paid to noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on graph images taken under various conditions from 0.1 to 10,000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The graph used is the dead leaf graph and standardized measurement such as visual noise derived from ISO 15739.
Evolution of visual noise with illuminance levels under handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the visual noise metric with lux level in handheld conditions. The visual noise metric is the average of the visual noise measurement across all areas of the Dead Leaves graph in the AFHDR configuration. SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.
Artifacts
77
Google Pixel 10 ProXL
Google Pixel 10 ProXL
Artifact evaluation looks at flares, lens shadows, chromatic aberrations, geometric distortions, edge ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color tone changes, among other types of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding point loss are listed below.
Major penalties for photography artifacts
Bokeh
165
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Bokeh is tested in a dedicated mode, usually portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all images captured in the laboratory and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce a portrait photograph comparable to one taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes that were paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur spotlights. The quality attributes of the portrait image (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.
Apple iPhone Air – Bokeh Mode

Apple iPhone Air – Slight loss of detail, nice subject segmentation
Apple iPhone 17 Pro – Bokeh Mode

Apple iPhone 17 Pro – Slight loss of detail, nice subject segmentation
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge – Bokeh Mode

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge – Loss of detail, nice subject segmentation
Tele
106
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths between approximately 40mm and 300mm, with particular attention to texture and detail. The score is derived from a series of objective measurements in the laboratory and perceptual analysis of real-life images.
Apple iPhone Air Telephoto Scores
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in focal length equivalent to 35 mm.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length
SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.
Apple iPhone Air – Tele Zoom

Apple iPhone Air – Detail Loss
Apple iPhone 17 Pro – Telephoto Zoom

Apple iPhone 17 Pro – Slight loss of detail
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge – Telephoto zoom

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge – Detail Leak
Video
155
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
About SBMARK Camera Video Tests
SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate nearly 3 hours of video in controlled laboratory environments and natural low-light scenes, indoors and outdoors, using default camera settings. The evaluation consists of visual inspection of natural videos taken under various conditions and performing objective measurements on videos of graphs recorded in the laboratory under different conditions from 0.1 to 10,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300 K to 6,500 K.
Not only is the photo quality of the iPhone Air very close to that of the main camera of the 17 Pro. The same goes for the video output. Video clips are bright, with a wide dynamic range, thanks to Apple’s HDR processing and format. Color rendition is generally accurate under most recording conditions, but our testers noted some slight white balance casts and matching issues, as well as some exposure instabilities.
Video footage offers a good compromise between texture and noise in bright light. Video noise is well under control and detail is good when recording in daylight or typical indoor lighting. Video autofocus is fast and mostly accurate, but we noticed occasional focus loss when tracking faces. The video stabilization is very effective and guarantees stable videos, even during recording. Furthermore, the movement is very smooth, thanks to the frame rate of 60 fps. The lack of tele and ultra-wide camera modules also negatively impacts the video experience, especially when zooming. While at the close-range tele settings video details are decent and at a similar level to the iPhone 17 Pro, there is a noticeable reduction in detail at the medium- and long-range tele settings.
Principal
178
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple iPhone Air Video Scores
Exposure
123
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Color
121
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Exposure tests evaluate the brightness level of the main subject, the overall contrast and the ability to render the dynamic range of the scene (ability to make details visible in both bright and dark areas). When the camera provides HDR Video format, videos are analyzed with display on an HDR reference monitor, under the reference conditions specified in the metadata. The stability and temporal adaptation of the exposure are also analyzed.
Image quality color analysis examines color rendering, skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading, white balance stability and its adaptation when the light changes.
Apple iPhone Air – Precise exposure, warm white balance, pleasant colors
Apple iPhone 17 Pro – Accurate target exposure, warm white balance, pleasant colors
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge – Accurate target exposure, neutral white balance, slightly red skin tones on light skin
Structure
113
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real videos and graphics videos recorded in the laboratory. Natural video footage is assessed visually, paying particular attention to the level of detail in bright and dark areas. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken under various conditions from 0.1 to 10000 lux. The cards used are SBMARK (DMC) card and Dead Leaves card.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) Video detail retention score versus lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention video score with the lux level in the video. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate the performance of texture and detail on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.
Noise
124
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real video recordings and on videos of graphs taken in the laboratory. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with particular attention to noise in dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on graph videos recorded under various conditions from 0.1 to 10000 lux. The graph used is the SBMARK visual noise graph.
Evolution of spatial visual noise with illuminance level
Temporal evolution of visual noise with illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with lux level. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setup.
Stabilization
122
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
The stabilization rating checks the device’s ability to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS or any other means. The evaluation examines residual motion, smoothness, gel artifacts, and residual motion blur in walking and running use cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt of one of the scenes tested.
Apple iPhone Air – Very effective stabilization
Apple iPhone 17 Pro – Very effective stabilization
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge – Effective stabilization
Artifacts
86
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR graph in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the LED universal timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shifting, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the deduction of points from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below.
Top penalties for video artifacts
Tele
116
VivoX200Ultra
VivoX200Ultra
SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail retention metric: a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.
All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths between approximately 12mm and 300mm, with particular attention to the consistency and smoothness of the zoom effect. The score is derived from a series of objective measurements in the laboratory and perceptual analysis of real-life video recordings.
Apple iPhone Air – Precise target exposure, slight loss of detail
Apple iPhone 17 Pro – Accurate target exposure, slight loss of detail
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge – Subject slightly underexposed, slight loss of detail

Start a new Thread